{"id":1805,"date":"2026-08-20T14:55:30","date_gmt":"2026-08-20T12:55:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/poe.pravo.upjs.sk\/?page_id=1805"},"modified":"2026-08-20T15:03:59","modified_gmt":"2026-08-20T13:03:59","slug":"recenzne-konanie","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/poe.pravo.upjs.sk\/?page_id=1805","title":{"rendered":"Recenzn\u00e9 konanie"},"content":{"rendered":"

V\u0161etky vedeck\u00e9 pr\u00edspevky podliehaj\u00fa nez\u00e1visl\u00e9mu extern\u00e9mu recenzn\u00e9mu konaniu<\/strong> pred ich prijat\u00edm na publikovanie.<\/p>\n

Z\u00e1kladn\u00fdm modelom recenzn\u00e9ho konania je double-blind peer review<\/strong>, pri ktorom identita autora nie je spr\u00edstupnen\u00e1 recenzentovi a identita recenzenta nie je spr\u00edstupnen\u00e1 autorovi.<\/p>\n

Ka\u017ed\u00fd pr\u00edspevok sa posudzuje najmenej dvoma nez\u00e1visl\u00fdmi recenzentmi<\/strong>, ktor\u00ed nie s\u00fa \u010dlenmi autorsk\u00e9ho t\u00edmu ani osobami s konfliktom z\u00e1ujmov vo vz\u0165ahu k autorovi alebo pr\u00edspevku. Po\u017eiadavka najmenej dvoch nez\u00e1visl\u00fdch recenzi\u00ed zodpoved\u00e1 \u0161tandardom transparentn\u00e9ho peer review pou\u017e\u00edvan\u00fdm pri kvalitn\u00fdch vedeck\u00fdch publik\u00e1ci\u00e1ch.<\/p>\n

Recenzenti posudzuj\u00fa najm\u00e4:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. originalitu a vedeck\u00fd pr\u00ednos,<\/li>\n
  2. aktu\u00e1lnos\u0165 a relevantnos\u0165 t\u00e9my,<\/li>\n
  3. formul\u00e1ciu cie\u013ea a vedeck\u00e9ho probl\u00e9mu,<\/li>\n
  4. primeranos\u0165 pou\u017eitej metodol\u00f3gie,<\/li>\n
  5. kvalitu argument\u00e1cie,<\/li>\n
  6. pr\u00e1cu s odbornou literat\u00farou a prame\u0148mi,<\/li>\n
  7. spr\u00e1vnos\u0165 a presved\u010divos\u0165 z\u00e1verov,<\/li>\n
  8. jazykov\u00fa a form\u00e1lnu \u00farove\u0148,<\/li>\n
  9. s\u00falad pr\u00edspevku so zameran\u00edm zborn\u00edka.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    V\u00fdsledkom recenzn\u00e9ho konania m\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • prijatie bez \u00faprav,<\/li>\n
    • prijatie po zapracovan\u00ed pripomienok,<\/li>\n
    • prepracovanie a op\u00e4tovn\u00e9 recenzn\u00e9 konanie,<\/li>\n
    • zamietnutie pr\u00edspevku.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      O kone\u010dnom prijat\u00ed pr\u00edspevku rozhoduje redakcia na z\u00e1klade recenzn\u00fdch posudkov. Recenzn\u00e9 konanie samo osebe nezaklad\u00e1 n\u00e1rok na publikovanie pr\u00edspevku. Ak s\u00fa recenzn\u00e9 posudky z\u00e1sadne protichodn\u00e9, redakcia m\u00f4\u017ee zabezpe\u010di\u0165 \u010fal\u0161\u00ed nez\u00e1visl\u00fd recenzn\u00fd posudok. Recenzenti sa vyberaj\u00fa pod\u013ea ich odbornej expert\u00edzy a relevantnej publika\u010dnej \u010dinnosti v oblasti posudzovan\u00e9ho pr\u00edspevku.<\/p>\n

      Recenzent nesmie pr\u00edspevok posudzova\u0165, ak existuje konflikt z\u00e1ujmov, najm\u00e4 ak:<\/p>\n

        \n
      • je spoluautorom autora v relevantnom obdob\u00ed,<\/li>\n
      • je alebo bol \u0161kolite\u013eom autora v bezprostredne relevantnom obdob\u00ed,<\/li>\n
      • p\u00f4sob\u00ed na rovnakom pracovisku a existuje riziko konfliktu z\u00e1ujmov,<\/li>\n
      • m\u00e1 osobn\u00fd, profesion\u00e1lny alebo finan\u010dn\u00fd z\u00e1ujem na v\u00fdsledku recenzn\u00e9ho konania,<\/li>\n
      • je v konkuren\u010dnom alebo inom vz\u0165ahu, ktor\u00fd m\u00f4\u017ee ovplyvni\u0165 jeho nestrannos\u0165.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        Recenzenti s\u00fa povinn\u00ed zachov\u00e1va\u0165 d\u00f4vernos\u0165 inform\u00e1ci\u00ed obsiahnut\u00fdch v rukopise a nesm\u00fa vyu\u017e\u00edva\u0165 nepublikovan\u00e9 inform\u00e1cie na vlastn\u00fd vedeck\u00fd prospech. Recenzent m\u00e1 povinnos\u0165 upozorni\u0165 redakciu na pr\u00edpadn\u00e9 podozrenie z plagi\u00e1torstva, duplicitn\u00e9ho publikovania, manipul\u00e1cie cit\u00e1ci\u00ed alebo in\u00e9ho poru\u0161enia publika\u010dnej etiky.<\/p>\n

        Tie pr\u00edspevky, ktor\u00e9 bud\u00fa vyhodnoten\u00e9 v r\u00e1mci recenzn\u00e9ho konania ako obzvl\u00e1\u0161\u0165 kvalitn\u00e9, bud\u00fa zaraden\u00e9 do recenzovan\u00e9ho zborn\u00edka pr\u00edspevkov<\/strong> z\u00a0vedeckej konferencie, ktor\u00fd organiz\u00e1tori konferencie post\u00fapia na zaradenie do datab\u00e1zy Web of Science <\/strong>a SCOPUS.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        V\u0161etky vedeck\u00e9 pr\u00edspevky podliehaj\u00fa nez\u00e1visl\u00e9mu extern\u00e9mu recenzn\u00e9mu konaniu pred ich prijat\u00edm na publikovanie. Z\u00e1kladn\u00fdm modelom recenzn\u00e9ho konania je double-blind peer review, pri ktorom identita autora nie je spr\u00edstupnen\u00e1 recenzentovi a identita recenzenta nie je spr\u00edstupnen\u00e1 autorovi. Ka\u017ed\u00fd pr\u00edspevok sa posudzuje najmenej dvoma nez\u00e1visl\u00fdmi recenzentmi, ktor\u00ed nie s\u00fa \u010dlenmi autorsk\u00e9ho t\u00edmu ani osobami s konfliktom z\u00e1ujmov … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1805","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/poe.pravo.upjs.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1805","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/poe.pravo.upjs.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/poe.pravo.upjs.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/poe.pravo.upjs.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/poe.pravo.upjs.sk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1805"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/poe.pravo.upjs.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1805\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1814,"href":"https:\/\/poe.pravo.upjs.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1805\/revisions\/1814"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/poe.pravo.upjs.sk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}